Preview

PROneft. Professionally about Oil

Advanced search

Vertual metering as a tool for ESP-equipped wells monitoring

https://doi.org/10.7868/S2587739920040114

Abstract

This paper describes an approach to creating a virtual flow metering system (VFM). Proposed method is based on electric submersible pump system’s monitoring. Whole VFM market was analyzed with taking method’s relevance, possible and real industry applications into consideration. Created algorithm uses data that is regularly collected from oilfields and stored in corporate’s databases. Mainly used parameters are well’s construction, telemetry data from ESP system, pressure and temperature from different parts of the well, and available oil production data, divided by phases, that is obtained rarely and used for calibration. Suggested solution considers electric part of an ESP system and so it reveals possibility to estimate ESP degradation dynamics for liquid-gas mixture production restoring by using correction coefficients. Presented algorithm was tested on the Company’s oilfield. One well is shown as an example of method’s work, including all steps from data preprocessing to liquid production dynamics recovering. Also results of algorithm usage on several dozen wells on various oilfields are presented. As one of the main results approving the possibility to increase liquid production measurements frequency should be mentioned. Such possibility is based on using indirect operating parameters and recovering dynamics of model’s inner coefficients (e.g., ESP degradation), that make possible to estimate effectiveness of pump exploitation and possible optimization necessity. As another important result implementing of the algorithm into Company’s IT systems should be mentioned. Such implementation reveals possibility for monitoring a big amount of wells in fast and effective way

About the Authors

A. M. Andrianova
Gazpromneft NTC LLC
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



A. A. Loginov
Gazpromneft NTC LLC
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



R. A. Khabibullin
Gazpromneft NTC LLC
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



O. S. Kobzar
MIPT Center for Engineering and Technology
Russian Federation


References

1. Sæther G. Software Determines Multiphase Flow without Meters. Petroleum Engineer International. 1998.

2. Berg K., Davalath J. Field Applications of Idun Production Measurement System. OTC, Houston, TX. 2002.

3. Rasmussen A. Field Applications of Model-based Multiphase Flow Computing. North Sea flow measurment workshop, St Andrews, UK, 2004 .

4. Ausen H., Stinessen M., Fonnes D., Holm H. Uncertainty evaluation applied to a model-based Virtual Flow Metering system.

5. Subsea – TechnipFMC plc. Available at: https://www.technipfmc.com/en/what-we-do/subsea (accessed 30.10.2020).

6. Ivanovskii V.N., Sabirov A. et al. Development and implementation of a virtual flow meter for wells equipped with centrifugal pump installations. Territoriya neftegaz. 2016, no. 11, pp. 115–120. (In Russ.)

7. Pashali A., Topol’nikov A., Mikhailov V. Recovery of flow rate based on “virtual flow meter” algorithms for well testing. Neftianoe khoziaistvo [Oil Industry Journal]. 2017, no. 11, pp. 63–67. (In Russ.)

8. Multiphase Flow Metering Solutions. Available at: https://www.arcweb.com/market-studies/multiphase-flow-metering-solutions (accessed 30.10.2020).

9. Bikmukhametov T., Jaschke J. First Principles and Machine Learning Virtual Flow Metering: A Literature. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106487

10. OVS Group Virtual Metering. Available at: http://ovsgroup.com/ovs_workflows/virtual-metering/ (accessed 30.10.2020).

11. Enhanced Virtual Flow Metering (PhD). Available at: https://www.ntnu.edu/subpro/enhanced-virtual-flow-metering (accessed 30.10.2020).

12. Brill J.P., Mukherjee H.K. Multiphase Flow in Wells. Texas, Richardson Publ., 1999.

13. Takacs G. Electrical Submersible Pumps Manual: Design, operations and Mainenance. Berlington, Oxford, Gulf Professional Publ., 2017.

14. Lasater J.A. Bubble point pressure correlation. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 1958, vol. 10, no. 05, pp. 65–67.

15. Vazquez M., Beggs H.D. Correlations for fluid physical property prediction. SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1977.

16. Brill J.P. Multiphase flow in wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 1987, vol. 39, iss. 01.

17. Marquez R.A., Prado M.G. A New Robust Model For Natural Separation Efficiency. SPE Production and Operations Symposium, 23–26 March, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 2003.

18. Ansari A.M., Sylvester N.D., Sarica C., Shoham O., Brill J.P. A comprehensive mechanistic model for upward two-phase flow in wellbores. SPE Production&Facilities.1994, May, pp. 143–152.

19. Perkins T.K. Critical and Subcritical Flow of Multiphase Mixtures through Chokes. SPE Drilling and Completion Journal. 1993, vol. 8, iss. 4, pp. 271–276.


Review

For citations:


Andrianova A.M., Loginov A.A., Khabibullin R.A., Kobzar O.S. Vertual metering as a tool for ESP-equipped wells monitoring. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2020;(4):75-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S2587739920040114

Views: 313


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7399 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0055 (Online)