Tendencies in hydraulically conductive natural fractures’ spatial orientations and distribution in vicinities of major faults
https://doi.org/10.24887/2587-7399-2019-3-18-24
Abstract
The paper presents the results of modelling the fields of fracture parameters in vicinities of large faults. Zones of developed fracture networks are determined based on geomechanical modelling alongside with such parameters as relative density and preferable spatial orientations of critically stressed fractures, which, under certain assumptions, are related to hydraulically conductive fractures. The faults of different types are considered with main tendencies in fracture parameters evolution while approaching the fault being analyzed.
About the Author
N. V. DubinyaRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Barton C.A., Zoback M.D., Moos D., Fluid flow along potentially active faults in crystalline rocks, Geology, 1995, V. 23, no. 8, pp. 683–686
2. Hickman S.H., Barton C.A., Zoback M.D., Morin R., Sass J., Benoit R., In situ stress and fracture permeability along the Stillwater fault zone, Dixie Valley, Nevada, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences Abstracts, 1997, V. 34, pp. 3–4.
3. Townend J., Zoback M.D., How faulting keeps the crust strong, Geology, 2000, V. 28, no. 5, pp. 399–402.
4. Rogers S., Critical stress-related permeability in fractured rocks, In: Fracture and in situ stress characterization of hydrocarbon reservoirs: edited by Ameen M.S., Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2002, V. 209, pp. P. 7–16.
5. Ligtenberg J.H., Detection of fluid migration pathways in seismic data: implications for fault seal analysis, Basin Research, 2005, V. 17, pp. 141–153.
6. Sathar S., Reeves H.J., Cuss R.J., Harrington J.F., The role of stress history on the flow of fluids through fractures, Mineralogical magazine, 2012, V. 76, no. 8, pp. 3165–3177.
7. Dubinya N., Tikhotsky S., Bayuk I., Beloborodov D., Krasnova M., Makarova A., Rusina O., Fokin I., Prediction of physical-mechanical properties and in-situ stress state of hydrocarbon reservoirs from experimental data and theoretical modeling (In Russ.), SPE 187823-MS, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2118/187823-MS.
8. Bisdom K., Bertotti G., Nick H.M., A geometrically based method for predicting stress-induced fracture aperture and flow in discrete fracture networks, AAPG Bulletin, 2016, V. 100, no. 7, pp. 1075–1097.
9. Schwab D.R., Bidgoli T.S., Taylor M.H., Characterizing the potential for injection-induced fault reactivation through subsurface structural mapping and stress field analysis, Wellington field, Sumner County, Kansas, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017, V. 122, pp. 10132–10154.
10. Dubinya N., Bayuk I., Tikhotskiy S., Rusina O., Localization and characterization of hydraulically conductive fractured zones at seismic scale with the help of geomechanical and rock physics modeling, Proceedings of 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 2018, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201800722
11. Coussy O., Poromechanics, J. Wiley & Sons, 2004, 312 p.
12. Kim J., Sequential method for coupled geomechanics and multiphase flow: PhD Thesis, 2010, 274 p.
13. Dubinya N., Lukin, S., Chebyshev I., Two-way coupled geomechanical analysis of naturally fractured oil reservoir’s behavior using finite element method (In Russ.), SPE 176631-MS, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2118/176631-MS
14. Anderson E.M., The dynamics of faulting and dyke formation with applications to Britain, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd Ltd. 1942.
15. Snyder J.P., Map projections – A working manual, United States Government Printing Office, 1987, 394 p.
Review
For citations:
Dubinya N.V. Tendencies in hydraulically conductive natural fractures’ spatial orientations and distribution in vicinities of major faults. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2019;(3):18-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/2587-7399-2019-3-18-24