Well interference analysis by multiple well deconvolution for pressure maintains system optimization
https://doi.org/10.24887/2587-7399-2019-3-56-61
Abstract
Permanent production surveillance with downhole pressure gauges and surface rate monitoring offer the possibility to use a wide range of analyses. Gazpromneft is constantly developing and searching for new approaches for data analysis to support decision making for production optimization. One of important areas is historical data analysis. One of promising approaches in this area is a multiple well deconvolution. The paper describes this technology and field cases of its application.
About the Authors
A. M. Aslanyan
Nafta College
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazan
D. N. Gulyaev
Polycod LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. M. Krichevskiy
Polycod LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
Kh. Z. Musaleev
Polycod LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. S. Margarit
Gazpromneft NTC LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
R. N. Asmandiyarov
Gazpromneft NTC LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
V. S. Kotezhekov
Gazpromneft NTC LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
I. S. Kaeshkov
Gazpromneft NTC LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
M. M. Bikkulov
Gazpromneft-Khantos LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Khanty-Mansiysk
References
1. Kremenetskiy M.I., Ipatov A.I., Gulyaev D.N., Informatsionnoe obespechenie i tekhnologii gidrodinamicheskogo modelirovaniya neftyanykh i gazovykh zalezhey (Information support and technologies of hydrodynamic modeling of oil and gas deposits), Izhevsk: Publ. of RKhD, 2012, 896 p.
2. Kokurina V.V., Kremenetskiy M.I., Krichevskiy V.M., Control of the efficiency of repeated hydraulic fracturing basing on the results of hydrodynamic surveys (In Russ.), Karotazhnik, 2013, V. 227, pp. 76–101.
3. Kotezhekov V., MargaritA., Pustovskih A., Sitnikov A., Development of automatic system for decline analysis (In Russ.), SPE 187755-RU, 2017.
4. Aslanyan A.M., Gulyaev D.N., Gil'fanov A.K., Krichevskiy V.M., Timerbaev M.R., Dynamic reservoir-pressure maintenance system study in carbonate reservoir with complicated pore structure by production analysis, production logging and well-testing (In Russ.), SPE 187776-RU, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2118/187776-RU
5. Musaleev Kh., Active technologies of production-logging and well-testing in injection wells with induced fractures (In Russ.), SPE 187792-RU, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2118/187792-RU
6. Aslanyan A., Grishko F., Krichevsky V., Gulyaev D., Panarina E., Buyanov A., Assessing waterflood efficiency with deconvolution based multi-well retrospective test technique, SPE 195518-MS, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2118/195518-MS.
Review
For citations:
Aslanyan A.M., Gulyaev D.N., Krichevskiy V.M., Musaleev Kh.Z., Margarit A.S., Asmandiyarov R.N., Kotezhekov V.S., Kaeshkov I.S., Bikkulov M.M. Well interference analysis by multiple well deconvolution for pressure maintains system optimization. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2019;(3):56-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/2587-7399-2019-3-56-61
Views:
281
Email this article 