Preview

PROneft. Professionally about Oil

Advanced search

Generalization with reverse-calibration of well and seismic data using machine learning methods for complex reservoirs predicting during early-stage geological exploration oil field

https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2023-8-2-157-164

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop and apply an autonomous approach for predicting the probability of hydrocarbon reservoirs spreading in the studied area.

Materials and methods. The prediction was made based on the 3D seismic survey data and well information on the early exploration stage of the studied field. The results of the lithological interpretation of logging from nine wells were used, four of which penetrated the object vertically or subvertically, while the remaining five were drilled horizontally through different stratigraphic parts of the Achimov sedimentary complex, which is the object of this study. The paper presents an approach based on a technological stack of machine learning algorithms with the task of binary classification and modification of the geological-geophysical dataset. The study includes the following sequence of actions: creation of data sets for training, selection of features, reverse-calibration of data, creation of a population of classification models, evaluation of classification quality, evaluation of the contribution of features in the prediction, ensembling the population of models by stacking method.

As a result, a prediction was made — a three-dimensional cube of calibrated probabilities of belonging of the studied space to the class of reservoir and its derivative in the form of the map of effective thicknesses of the Achimov complex of deposits was obtained. Assessment of changes in the quality of the forecast depending on the use of different data sets was carried out.

Conclusion. The reverse-calibration method proposed in this work uses the uncertainty of geophysical data as a hyperparameter of the global tuning of the technological stack, within the given limits of the a priori error of these data. It is shown that the method improves the quality of the forecast. The technological stack of machine learning algorithms used in this work allows expert-independent generalization of geological and geophysical data, and use this generalization to test hypotheses and create geological models based on a probabilistic view of the reservoir. The approach, formalizes the generalization of data about the target, using only factual information such as lithology along the wellbore and seismic data. Depending on the input data, the approach can be a useful tool for finding and exploring geologic targets, identifying potential resources, and optimizing and designing reservoir development systems.

About the Author

D. A. Ivlev
Zarubezhneft Middle East LLC
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Ivlev — Regional Manager for the subsurface part of oil and gas projects

9 Armianskiy pereulok, house 9, building 1, Moscow, 101000



References

1. BoostARoota GitHub repository. https://github.com/chasedehan/BoostARoota

2. Prokhorenkova G., Gusev A., Vorobev A., Dorogush, Gulin A. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. In: Bengio S., Wallach H., Larochelle H., Grauman K., Cesa-Bianchi N., Garnett R. editors. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS’18). Curran Associates, 2018.

3. Ivlev D. Reservoir Prediction by Machine Learning Methods on The Well Data and Seismic Attributes for Complex Coastal Conditions. arxiv preprint arxiv:2301.03216v1 2023.

4. Bergstra james S., et al. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2011.

5. Bergstra james, Daniel Yamins, David Cox. Making a science of model search: Hyperparameter optimization in hundreds of dimensions for vision architectures. Proceedings of The 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2013.

6. Ke q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, q. Ye, T.-Y. Liu. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: I. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett editors. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS’17). Curran Associates, 2017.

7. Chen and C. Guestrin. xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: B. Krishnapuram, M. Shah, A. Smola, C. Aggarwal, D. Shen, and R. Rastogi editors. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’16), ACM Press, 2016, pp. 785–794.

8. Hollmann N., Müller S., Eggensperger K., Hutter F. TabPFN. A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second. arxiv preprint arxiv: 2207.01848v4, 2022.

9. Scott Lundberg, Su-In Lee. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. arxiv preprint arxiv:1705.07874v2, 2017.


Review

For citations:


Ivlev D.A. Generalization with reverse-calibration of well and seismic data using machine learning methods for complex reservoirs predicting during early-stage geological exploration oil field. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2023;8(2):157-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2023-8-2-157-164

Views: 173


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7399 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0055 (Online)