Case studies and operation features of transient multiphase flow in low-flow wells with multistage fracturing and extended horizontal wellbore operated with ESP in PSA mode
https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2024-9-1-78-94
Abstract
Background. For industrial oil production from shale oil formations, it is necessary to drill wells with an extended horizontal wellbore (HW) and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing (MHF). During the entire life of the well, the rate of decline in production rates is well described by Arps curves. During the first year of operation, the rate of decline in production varies from 60 to 80%, wells become low-flow and to effectively extract oil from them it is necessary to use artificial extraction methods. The most popular and effective method today is an electric centrifugal pump (ESP), which is used both when operating in continuous mode and when operating in periodic short-term activation mode (PSA), which allows oil to be extracted from wells at flow rates not exceeding several tons per hour. When the ESP operates in the PCA mode, the flow in the well is unsteady, and to optimize operating modes it is necessary to use specialized simulators for modeling multiphase unsteady flow.
Aim. This work is devoted to the analysis and modeling of operating modes of low-flow wells with an extended HW and MHF during artificial lift with an electric submersible pump (ESP). The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the operating modes of wells in the Bazhenov formation with HW and MHF, operating with an ESP. Complications during the operation of ESPs in such wells are shown, associated both with the removal of proppant and with a constant decrease in productivity and an increase in the gas factor, and data on the operation of various types of ESPs in wells of complex design are provided.
Materials and methods. One of the main achievements of the work is the methodology for creating a model of multiphase unsteady flow in a well with an ESP operating in the PSA mode using specialized so` ware. To accurately describe the physical processes, various approaches were used to numerically simulate unsteady multiphase flows in a well with an ESP with a downhole separator. Difficulties that may arise during well operation were considered through the analysis of field data and the results of numerical modeling.
Results. The article demonstrates the process of tuning the unsteady operating modes of two wells with ESP in PSA mode using specialized so` ware based on real field data (multiphase flow meter, pressure gauges, etc.) taking into account the well design, ESP characteristics, additional equipment (valves, separator and etc.) and formation parameters. The model was tuned to actual data, and possible ways to optimize the operating mode were shown. In addition, the work provides an analysis of the sensitivity of fluid properties and well parameters to unsteady flow in the well.
Conclusion. The work analyzed the operation of more than 40 low-flow wells with HW and MHF with ESP in PSA mode. According to the results of the analysis, ESPs in PSA mode can effectively reduce bottomhole pressure to minimum values of 20–30 bar, provided there is a stable fluid level in the annulus. To select the optimal operating mode of the ESP in PSA mode for low-flow wells, it is recommended to use mathematical models of unsteady multiphase flow in wells.
About the Authors
T. S. YushchenkoRussian Federation
Taras S. Yushchenko — Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.),Head of direction
3–5, Pochtamtskaya str., 190000, Saint Petersburg
E. V. Demin
Russian Federation
Evgeniy V. Demin — Chief specialist
Saint Petersburg
V. A. Ivanov
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Ivanov — Bachelor’s degree graduate
Saint Petersburg
R. A. Khabibullin
Russian Federation
Rinat A. Khabibullin — Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Head of direction
Saint Petersburg
A. V. Volkov
Russian Federation
Alexey V. Volkov — Head of division
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Vashkevich A., Strizhnev K., Cherevko M. Gazprom Neft Implements Technology Strategy for Development of Nonconventional Reserves. Rogtec, 2015. — No. 41. — P. 54–61.
2. Lei Q., Xu Y., Cai B., Guan B., et al.Progress and prospects of horizontal well fracturing technology for shale oil and gas reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022. — Vol. 49. — Issue 1. — P. 191–199.
3. Johanis P.E., Triffiletti G.E. Trends in Vaca Muerta Horizontal Wells Stimulation. Paper presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 2017. https://doi.org/10.2118/185463-MS
4. Korobitsyn D.A., Yanaev A.M.; Bochkarev A.V., Erofeev A.A., et al. Results of Implementing an Integrated Approach to Modeling, Planning and Conducting of Hydraulic Fracturing on Bazhenov Shale. SPE-202065-MS. — 2020. — 13 p.
5. Rodionova I.I., Shabalin M.A., Kapishev D.Yu., Bakirov R.I. and others. Choosing a development strategy for a field with hardto-recover reserves at the development stage. Oil Industry, 2019. — No. 12. — P. 1154.
6. Medina, Jonatan, Salcedo, Gervasio Jose, Sergio Eduardo Olave. Drilling Horizontal Well of 3200 m Lateral Length in Vaca Muerta Formation. Paper presented at the SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Neuquen, Argentina, August 2018. https://doi.org/10.2118/191850-MS
7. Alzahabi A., Kamel A., Trindade A.A., Baustian W. Data Analytics Quickly Predict Number of Fracture Stages in Horizontal Wells. ARMA-2019-0475. — 2019. — 10 p.m.
8. Yushchenko T.S., Demin E.V., Khabibullin R.A., Sorokin K.S. Case Studies and Operation Features of Long Horizontal Wells in Bazhenov Formation. SPE Prod & Oper, 2023. — No. 38. — P. 185–199. https://doi.org/10.2118/206482-PA
9. Rojas D., Lerza A. Horizontal Well Productivity Enhancement through Drawdown Management Approach in Vaca Muerta Shale. SPE-189822-MS. — 2018. — 13 p.
10. Wilson K., Hanna Alla R.R. Efficient Stress Characterization for Real-Time Drawdown Management. URTeC: 2721192. — 2017. — 15 p.
11. Ruiz Maraggi L., Lavia M.A., Savioli G.B. Production Decline Analysis in the Vaca Muerta Formation. The Application of Modern Time-Relations Uding Public Data. SPE-180971-MS. — 2016. — 43 p.
12. Dvoretskaya E.A., Salishchev M.V. Methodological approaches to assessing the stimulated reservoir volume during the development of unconventional oil reserves. SPE-191492-18RPTC-RU. — 2018. — 27 p.
13. Khoshghadam M., Khanal A., Yu C., Rabinejadganji N., Lee W.J. Producing Gas-Oil Ratio Behavior of Unconventional Volatile-Oil Reservoirs, and Its Application in Production Diagnostics and Decline Curve Analysis. URTeC 2670925. — 2017. — 17 p.
14. Lund L. Decline Curve Analysis of Shale Oil Production. The Case of Eagle Ford. URTeC ES 14039. — 2014. — 65 p.
15. Singh I., Saraf A., Pathak A.R., Bandyopadhyay B., et al.Executing Unconventional Coiled Tubing Sand Plugs for Multistage Fracturing Operations in Hp/Ht Wells. OTC-30791-MC. — 2020. — 10 p.m.
16. Potapenko D., Theuveny B., Williams R., Moncada K. Protect Wells During Frac Plug Drillouts and Well Flowback Operations for Hydraulically Fractured Wells — The State of the Art in 2020. SPE-203221-MS. — 2020. — 11 p.
17. Putri K., Lu H., Kwok C.K., Moncada K. Flowback in Shale Wells: Proppant Transport and Distribution in the Wellbore. URTeC-2887450. — 2018. — 12 p.m.
18. Thakur K.K., Katoozi K., Hamid A. Long Cyclic Well Slugging Behavior Induced by Sand Production; Analysisand Mitigation Solution Enabled by Transient Multiphase Flow Simulation. SPE-195740-MS. — 2019. — 10 p.m.
19. Lu H., Anifowosh O., Xu L. Understanding the Impact of Production Slugging Behavior on Near-Wellbore Hydraulic Fracture and Formation Integrity. SPE-189488-MS. — 2018. — 15p.
20. Rudnitsky S.V., Zatsepin A.Yu. Demin E.V., Yushchenko T.S. Promising well equipment for the production of shale oil from the Bazhenov formation. PRONEFT. Professionally about oil. — 2021. — No. 1 (19). — pp. 64–75.
21. Patron K.E., Billdal X.C., Lu H., Kutluev D. Artificial Lift Strategy for the Life Cycle of Unconventional Wells: A Case Study for Horizontal Shale Wells. SPE-192458-MS. — 2018. — 10 p.m.
22. Britvar J., Williams S. Improving ESP Application for Unconventional Wells in the Bakken. SPE-185150-MS. — 2017. https://doi.org/10.2118/185150-MS
23. Likhacheva E.A., Ostrovsky V.G., Lykova N.A., Musinsky A.N., Baidarov P.A. Reliability of submersible oil pumps during periodic operation. PRONEFT. Professionally about oil. — 2021. — No. 1 (19). — pp. 54–58.
24. OLGA Dynamic Multiphase Flow Simulator the industry-standard tool for dynamic multiphase flow simulation. https://www.software.slb.com/products/olga. — 2021.
25. Ashfahani A.S., Sulistiyo S., Hapsari H.S. Dynamic Well Modeling, Where are We?: Mahakam Operation Experience for Well Diagnostics & Optimization. SPE-196248-MS. — 2020. — 31 p.
26. Pankaj P., Patron K.E., Lu H. Artifi cial Lift Selection and Its Applications for Deep Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs. URTeC: 2875180. — 2018. — 21 p.
27. Kolawole O., Gamadi T., Bullard D. Comprehensive Review of Artifi cial Lift System Applications in Tight Formations. SPE- 196592. — 2019. — 21 p.
28. Yogashri P. Observed Gas-Oil Ratio Trends in Liquids Rich Shale Reservoirs. URTeC-2020-3229-MS. Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Virtual. — 2020. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2020-3229
29. Turner R.G., Hubbard M.G., Dukler A.E. Analysis and Prediction of Minimum Flow Rate for the Continuous Removal of Liquids from Gas Wells. JPT, SPE-2198. — November, 1969. — P. 1475–1482
30. Yushchenko T.S., Brusilovsky A.I. A step-by-step approach to the creation and adaptation of PVT models of reservoir hydrocarbon systems based on the equation of state. Georesursy, 2022. — No. 24 (3). — pp. 164–181. https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2022.3.14
Review
For citations:
Yushchenko T.S., Demin E.V., Ivanov V.A., Khabibullin R.A., Volkov A.V. Case studies and operation features of transient multiphase flow in low-flow wells with multistage fracturing and extended horizontal wellbore operated with ESP in PSA mode. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2024;9(1):78-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2024-9-1-78-94