Carbonate reservoir rock typing algorithm based on integrated approach (IRT)
https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2021-6-4-62-70
Abstract
Common rock typing approaches for carbonate rocks are based on texture, pore classification, electrofacies, or flow unit localization (FZI) and are often misleading because they based on sedimentation processes or mathematical justification. As a result, the identified rock types may poorly reflect the real distribution of reservoir rock characteristics.
Materials and methods. The approach described in the work allows to eliminate such effects by identifying integrated rock types that control the static properties and dynamic behavior of the reservoir, while optimally linking with geological characteristics (diagenetic transformations, sedimentation features, as well as their union effect) and petrophysical characteristics (reservoir properties, relationship between the porosity and permeability, water saturation, radius of pore channels and others). The integrated algorithm consists of 8 steps, allowing the output to obtain rock-types in the maximum possible way connecting together all the characteristics of the rock, available initial information. The first test in the Middle East field confirmed the applicability of this technique.
Results. The result of the work was the creation of a software product (certificate of state registration of the computer program “Lucia”, registration number 2021612075 dated 02/11/2021), which allows automating the process of identifying rock types in order to quickly select the most optimal method, as well as the possibility of their integration. As part of the product, machine learning technologies were introduced to predict rock types based on well logs in intervals not covered by coring studies, as well as in wells in which there is no coring.
About the Authors
Mariia A. KuntsevichRussian Federation
Sergey V. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
Igor V. Perevozkin
Russian Federation
References
1. Gomes J.S., et al. Reservoir Rock Typing. The Link between Geology and SCAL. “Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference”, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 3–6 November, 2008 (IPTC-13120-MS).
2. Rebelle M., Bruno L. Rock Typing in Carbonates: A Critical Review of Clustering Methods. “Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference”, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 10–13 November, 2014. doi: 10.2118/171759-MS.
3. Lucia F.J. Petrophysical parameters estimated from visual descriptions of carbonate rocks: a field classification of carbonate pore space. SPE ATCE, San Antonio, 5–7 October, 1983 (SPE 10073).
4. Amaefule J.O., Altunbay M., Tiab D., Kersey D.G., Keelan D.K. Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. 68th SPE ATCE, Houston, 3–6 October, 1993 (SPE 26436).
5. Skalinski M., Kenter J. Carbonate Petrophysical Rock Typing — Integrating Geological attributes and Petrophysical Properties While Linking with Dynamic Behavior. Geological Society. 30 May 2014, London, Special Publications, 406, pp. 229-259. doi: 10.1144/SP406.6
Review
For citations:
Kuntsevich M.A., Kuznetsov S.V., Perevozkin I.V. Carbonate reservoir rock typing algorithm based on integrated approach (IRT). PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2021;6(4):62-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2021-6-4-62-70