Preview

PROneft. Professionally about Oil

Advanced search

Deconvolution formation pressure as the basis of the modern pressure survey program reducing production deferment

https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-2-39-48

Abstract

Introduction. Energy distribution at a hydrocarbon pay is a very important part of reservoir development analysis with a strong impact on production performance. Estimating formation pressure across the field is a highly important routine procedure which is unfortunately very costly due to production deferment during the well shutin for pressure survey.

Goal. To provide the methodology and case study of the estimation of formation pressure based on deconvolution of the long-term permanent downhole pressure monitoring and its correlation with the offset wells production history.

Materials and methods. The formation pressure estimation is based on a multi-well pressure-rate relationship for a given group of wells. The pressure-rate model is based on convolution of pressure transient self-response and pressure transient cross-well responses with rate histories. The pressure transient responses are deconvolved for the historical records of permanent downhole pressure gauges. Deconvolution formation pressure is a self-validated methodology, which means it can check is own accuracy during well production. The moment a bottom-hole pressure from convolution pressure-rate model prediction starts deviates from historical records substantially one should repeat the deconvolution process form this historical moment onwards and provide the new set of model parameters for the rest of the production history.

Results. The technology has been developed for reservoir pressure evaluation using multi-well deconvolution without actual well shut-ins.

Conclusion. Deconvolutional formation pressure, as the basis of modern reservoir surveillance programs, allows operators to reduce costs by providing an opportunity to predict the value of reservoir pressure in real time without production deferment.

About the Authors

A. M. Aslanyan
Nafta College LLC
Russian Federation

Artur M. Aslanyan — Rector 

Kazan 



A. V. Kibirev
Gazpromneft -Zapolyarye LLC
Russian Federation

Artem V. Kibirev — Head of programs for support and management of business cases changes

Tumen 



V. V. Ovcharov
Gazpromneft -Zapolyarye LLC
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Ovcharov — Head of programs of business cases development for achieving potential

Tumen 



A. R. Ayupov
Sofoil LLC
Russian Federation

Amir R. Ayupov — Business development manager

Kazan 



D. N. Gulyaev
Sofoil LLC
Russian Federation

Danila N. Gulyaev — Project manager in the software development department

59/1, of. 2, Magistralnaya str., 420074, Kazan 



References

1. Kim V.Yu., Gulyaev D.N., Ayupov A.R., Bakinova E.V. An example of restoring the history of reservoir pressure of wells without the need to stop them using multi-well deconvolution / In the book: GeoBaikal 2022. Collection of materials of the 7th scientific and practical conference. Moscow, 2023; 115–118.

2. Kim V.Yu., Aslanyan A.M., Gulyaev D.N., Farakhova R.R. Conducting hydrodynamic studies of the inter-well space without production losses while organizing a reservoir pressure maintenance system in the carbonate reservoirs of Eastern Siberia. The Oil Industry. 2020;9:38–43.

3. Gulyaev D.N., Zhdanov I.A., Ridel A.A., Pakhomov E.S., Kolesnikov M.V., Aslanyan A.M., Farakhova R.R., Krichevsky V.M., Guss R.V. Downhole studies to adapt the geological and hydrodynamic model in order to identify zones of residual reserves and increase production at a mature field. PROne~. Professionally about oil. 2022;7(3(25)):42–51.

4. Mushegova A.I., Radkova E.Yu., Gulyaev D.N. Application of mathematical deconvolution algorithms to optimize the reservoir pressure maintenance system using the example of an off shore field / In the book: New technologies in the gas industry (gas, oil, energy). Abstracts of reports. Moscow, 2023; 106–107.

5. Radkova E.Yu., Mushegova A.I., Gulyaev D.N., Nikonorova A.N. Increase in oil production at a field in Eastern Siberia based on the results of multi-well retrospective testing. In the collection: Current problems of oil and gas / Proceedings of the VI All Russian Youth Scientific Conference. Moscow, 2023; 65–68.

6. Aslanyan A., Akimov A., Yamalov I., Ovcharov V., Gadelshin E., Krichevsky V., Gulyaev D., Farakhova R. Systematic approach in testing field data analysis techniques with an example of Multiwell Retrospective Testing. 2020.

7. Aslanyan A., Asmadiyarov R., Kaeshkov I., Bikkulov M., Farakhova R., Krichevsky V., Gulyaev D., Musaleev K. Multiwell Deconvolution as important guideline to production optimisation: Western Siberia case study / In the collection: International Conference on Non-traditional Technologies 2019, IPTC 2019. 2019.

8. Yamalov I., Ovcharov V., Akimov A., Gadelshin E., Aslanyan A., Krichevsky V., Gulyaev D., Farakhova R. Systematic approach in testing field data analysis techniques with an example of Multiwell Retrospective Testing / In the collection: Conference on International Technologies of Asia 2020, OTCA 2020. 2020.


Review

For citations:


Aslanyan A.M., Kibirev A.V., Ovcharov V.V., Ayupov A.R., Gulyaev D.N. Deconvolution formation pressure as the basis of the modern pressure survey program reducing production deferment. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2025;10(2):39-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-2-39-48

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7399 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0055 (Online)