Adaptive algorithm for non-structural traps multivariant calculations while net pay volume probabilistic assessment
https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-4-40-51
Abstract
Introduction. Traditionally, uncertainties associated with the net pay volume prediction in the inter-well space contribute to the greatest challenges in the geological & economic assessment. Depending on the specifi c features of productive deposits in the areas being evaluated, it becomes necessary to develop universal algorithms for adapting the calculation process.
Aim. The purpose of this work is to optimize large-scale exploration projects by universalizing fluid-saturated thicknesses multi-variant calculations approaches, depending on the quantity, type, and quality of the initial geological & geophysical information.
Materials and methods. An adaptive integrated algorithm for multi-variant calculations using the Workflow function in geological so ware packages has been developed, which provides for more than 2,500 possible scenarios depending on a variety of factors. The algorithm includes calculations auto-adaptation as well as a specifi c numerical combination for triggering specifi c cycles.
Results. The use of this algorithm allows for the automation and, thus, signifi cant acceleration of the process of multivariate geological assessment of fluid-saturated volumes.
Conclusion. The adaptation of multi-variant calculations increases the large-scale geological exploration projects value at the exploration stage, both in terms of reducing the time & labor required, and in terms of the ability to calculate additional intervals within the allocated time for geological evaluation.
About the Author
I. A. Perepletkin
Gazprom neft companу group
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Perepletkin — Chief specialist, Gazprom neft companу group
3–5, Pochtamtskaya str., 190121 Saint Petersburg
AuthorID: 962435
Scopus: 57205282863
References
1. Charles J. G. Experience with the quantification of subsurface uncertainties. Tulsa: SEG, 2001. 424 p. 2. Esiri A., Jambol D., Ozowe C. Enhancing reservoir characterization with integrated analysis and geostatistical methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary sciences. 2024, p. 12.
2. Averbukh A.G. et al. Guidelines for creating permanent geological and technological models of oil and gas-oil deposits. Moscow: VNIIOENG, 2003. 164 p. (In Russ.) 4. Bukatov M.V., Peskova D.N., Nenasheva M.G. Key Problems of Achimov deposits development at diff erent research scales. PRONEFT. Professionally about Oil. 2018, vol. 2, pp.16–21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/2587-7399-2018-2-16-21
3. Morozov V.Yu., Sapianik V.V. Actual problems of development of the oil and gas potential of Western Siberia. Geology of Oil and Gas. 2018, no. 3, pp. 27–36. (In Russ.)
4. Germakhanov A. et al. Justifi cation of the economic feasibility of geological exploration of objects at the expense of state programs and projects. Nedra Discussion Club. 2023, pp. 122–130. (In Russ.)
5. Igilmanov B. Calculation of carbohydrate reserves based on a 3D model in the TNavigator simulator. Application of Workflow for work optimization. Yessenov science journal. 2022, no. 2(43), pp. 87–94. (In Russ.)
6. Methodology for assessing new assets for exploration and production of hydrocarbons by BRD. St. Petersburg: Gazprom Ne Group of Companies, 2022. 122 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kovalevsky E.V. Geological modeling based on geostatistics. Moscow: TsGE, 2011. 100 p. (In Russ.)
8. Perepletkin I.A. Technical solutions for accounting vertical inhomogeneities in 2D-modeling algorithms during reserves probabilistic estimation. In: Geology in the Developing World. Collection of Scientifi c Papers based on the materials of the XVIII International Scientifi c and Practical Conference of Students, Postgraduates, and Young Scientists. Perm, 2025. Pp. 313–317. (In Russ.)
9. Perepletkin I.A. Zakharova O.A. The base of algorithms for probabilistic assessment of objects of various genesis // Actual problems of geology, geophysics and geoecology. XXXVI youth scientifi c school-conference. Apatity, 2025. Pp. 61–65. (In Russ.)
10. Perrin M., Rainaud J.-M. Shared earth modeling. Knowledge driven solutions for building and managing subsurface 3D geological model. Paris: Editions Technip, 2013. 399 p.
11. Lin L. et al. Optimizing the reservoir model of delta front sandstone using Seismic to Simulation workflow: A case study in the South China Sea. SEG International Exposition and 86th Annual Meeting Expanded Abstracts, 2016, pp. 2821–2825.
12. Song Y. et al. A workflow for turbidite reservoir characterization — a case study of the Macedon member, Northern Carnarvon Basin, NW Australia. Front. Earth Sci. 2023, no. 11, p. 15.
13. Dubrule O. Geostatistics in petroleum geology. Tulsa: AAPG Continuing Education. Course Note Series. 1998, no. 38, p. 127.
14. Perepechkin M.V. Technology of constructing geological models based on geological and geophysical data in the DV-Geo so1ware package: PhD Thesis. — Moscow: RGGRU named a1er Ordzhonikidze, 2007. 22 p. (In Russ.)
15. Colombera L., Mountney N.P., Medici G., Jared West L. The geometry of fluvial channel bodies: empirical charachterization and implications for object-based models of the subsurface. AAPG bulletin. 2019, no. 103, pp. 905–929.
16. Asmayev D.A. et al. ProGRRess: Geological exploration as a business. Materials of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference. Sochi, 2023, p. 4. (In Russ.)
17. Perepletkin I.A., Zakharova O.A. An Integrated approach to geological express assessment of multiple objects. new tech nologies for the oil and gas region // Materials of the international scientifi c and practical conference of students, postgradu ate students, and young scientists. In 2 volumes. Tyumen, 2025. Pp. 18–21. (In Russ.)
18. Perepletkin I.A. Approach to modeling and probabilistic estimation of the reservoir volume of coastal-marine deposits in areas with limited geological and geophysical study (based on the example of the middle jurassic deposits of Western Siberia and the fran-famennian deposits of the Volga-Ural Region). Geology, Geoecology, and Resource Potential of the Urals and Adjacent Territories: XIII All-Russian Youth Conference Proceedings. 2025. Pp. 101–104. (In Russ.)
19. Perepletkin I.A., Zaboyeva A.A., Muzraeva B.Yu. Conducting a multi-variant assessment of the productive volume of the Achimov deposits, taking into account the conceptual features of the geological structure./ Problems of Geology and Subsoil Development. Proceedings of the XXIX International Symposium. Tomsk. 2025, Vol. II, pp. 40–41. (In Russ.)
20. Perepletkin I.A., Alekhin I.I., Viktorova E.M. Universal methods of multi-variant calculations of non-structural traps taking into account the complex geological structure. Actual problems of oil and gas. VII All-Russian Youth Conference Proceedings. Moscow: IPNG RAS, 2024. Pp. 155–159. (In Russ.)
21. Saakyan M.I., Zakrevsky K.E., Lepilin A.E., Akhmetov C.R. On the prospects of creating corporate so1ware for geological modeling. Oil Industry. 2019, no. 11, pp. 50–54. (In Russ.)
22. The history of call center development: where it all started. Digital technologies: outsourcing contact center. (In Russ.) [Electronic resource.] URL: https://www.dtco.ru/articles/
23. Demyanov V.V., Savelyeva E.A. Geostatistics: Theory and Practice. Moscow: Nauka, 2010; 327. (In Russ.)
24. Yilmaz O. Seismic Data Analysis. Tulsa: SEG, 2001. P. 1027.
25. Belozerov B.V., Butorin A.V., Kaigorodov S.V., Faizov R.Z. Practical tips for 3D geological modeling. 2nd edition. MoscowIzhevsk: Institute of Computer Research, 2018. 424 p. (In Russ.)
26. Kiselev V.S. et al. Instructions for assessing the quality of structural constructions and the reliability of identifi ed and pre pared seismic surveys (for oil and gas operations). 1984. 76 p. (In Russ.)
27. Kurkin A.A. Assessment of the spatial distribution of errors in structural constructions. Oil and Gas. 2016, no. 1, pp. 15–21. (In Russ.)
28. Pyrcz M., Deutsch C. Geostatistical reservoir modeling. Oxford University Press, 2014. 449 p.
29. Alekhin I.I., Perepletkin I.A., Meshcheryakova A.S. Methodology for variations in the structural plan of a multilayer deposit with complex geological structure. Actual Problems of Oil and Gas. 2024, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 122–140. (In Russ.)
30. Perepletkin I.A., Kosmacheva M.S. Dynamic analysis capabilities for predicting reservoir propagation with a low seismic data maturity. PRONEFT. Professionally about oil. 2025, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 14–27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-103-14-27
31. Guide to forming a conceptual framework for major exploration projects. St. Petersburg: Gazprom Ne PJSC, 2022. P. 103. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Perepletkin I.A. Adaptive algorithm for non-structural traps multivariant calculations while net pay volume probabilistic assessment. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2025;10(4):40-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-4-40-51
Views:
18
Email this article 