Fractional sands — New instrument for hydraulic fracturing optimization
https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-4-86-98
Abstract
Background. For maintain and increasing oil production, in modern world it is required to development of hard-to-recover reservoirs, at the same time costs of building wells are increasing and barrel price is at a low level. All of that leads oil Companies to find new solutions and optimize costs. In this article, the authors show one of direction for optimization hydraulic fracturing, where they saw the potential for partial replacement ceramic proppant agent to a cheaper option, fractional sand. The work demonstrates the entire process, from finding suitable materials and suppliers to conducting calculations in various simulation tools and launching experimental work.
Materials and methods. The paper describes the entire process of investigating relationships, from the initial idea to its implementation in practice. It gives a basic assessment of the choice of a solution based on the geological conditions at the development sites and the properties of available proppant agents. This work allowed identifying boundary criteria for fractional sand and outlining a strategy for its implementation. Computational modeling and analytical sok ware, as well as production forecasting using a hydrodynamic model, became additional tools for experimental work.
Results. The evaluation of the results from the fractional sand research has allowed establishing the criteria for its use, as well as formulating requirements for product suppliers. A method for evaluating potential has been developed, which allows for calculating the possibility of replacing proppant with sand in any geological settings. To reduce the risk of failing to achieve the desired production level, a strategy has been chosen to gradually increase the proportion of sand used in experimental work, with long-term monitoring of well performance and comparison with other wells in the area. At some facilities, a 30% replacement of the ceramic proppant agent with fractional sand has been achieved without loss of production, which is a strong indicator of the effectiveness of the approach and validity of the initial theory.
Conclusion. The direction of optimizing the cost of hydraulic fracturing using fractional sand has become an effective solution for the company. At the same time, the authors note that, in addition to product quality, an important and fundamental element of further development of this solution is its cost.
About the Authors
A. V. ChurakovRussian Federation
Artem V. Churakov — Head of the Fracturing Competence Center
3–5, Pochtamtskaya str., 190121, Saint Petersburg
M. N. Pichugin
Russian Federation
Maksim N. Pichugin — Leader of direction
Saint Petersburg
R. R. Gaynetdinov
Russian Federation
Ruslan R. Gaynetdinov — Leader of direction
Saint Petersburg
D. A. Staritsin
Russian Federation
Dmitry A. Staritsin — Leader of Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Development Programs
Saint Petersburg
E. V. Shel
Russian Federation
Egor V. Shel — Head of Digitalization programs and IT Tools for Hydraulic Fracturing
Saint Petersburg
N. A. Shapovalenko
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Shapovalenko — Head specialist
Saint Petersburg
I. G. Fayzullin
Russian Federation
Ildar G. Fayzullin — Director of Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Development Programs
Saint Petersburg
A. V. Ivshin
Russian Federation
Anatoliy V. Ivshin — Project manager
Saint Petersburg
N. V. Chebykin
Russian Federation
Nikolay V. Chebykin — Project manager
Saint Petersburg
I. S. Samoylov
Russian Federation
Ivan S. Samoylov — Leader of direction
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Feng Liang, Mohammed Sayed, Ghaithan A. Al-Muntasheri, Frank F. Chang, Leiming Li. A comprehensive review on proppant technologies Petroleum. March 2016. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/petroleum
2. Churakov A.V., Pichugin M.N., Khasanshin R.N., Kushnikov I.V., Barkalov S.Y., Fayzullin I.G. Ultra-light weight proppants — perspectives and experience of application in hydraulic fracturing. PRONEFT. Professionally about oil. 2022, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 118–125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2022-7-1-118-125
3. Kurz B, Schmidt D., Cortese P. Investigation of Improved Conductivity and Proppant Application in the Bakekn Formation. Paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference in the Woodlands, Texas, USA 4–6 February 2013. SPE-163849-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163849-MS
4. Muzzammil Shakeel, Waseem Abdulrazzaq, Osman Abdullatif, Mohammed Benaafi. Detailed Comparison of Processed Sand vs. Unprocessed Sand vs. High-Strength Proppant for Fracturing Applications. SPE-194924-MS. Bahrain, 18–21 March 2019. https://doi.org/10.2118/194924-MS
5. Flowers J.R., Guetta D.R., Stephenson C.J., Jeremie P., d’Arco N. A Statistical Study of Proppant Type vs. Well Performance in the Bakken Central Basin. Paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, February 4–6, 2014. SPE168618-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168618-MS
6. Hu K., Schmidt A., Barhaug J., Wong J., Tian J., Hall B.E. Sand, Resing-Coated jr Ceramic Proppant? The Eff ect of Diff erent Proppants on the Long-Term Production of Bakken Shale Wells. Energy and Environmental Services. SPE-174816-MS. Texas, USA, 28–30 September 2015. https://doi.org/10.2118/174816-MS
7. Yudin A., Rakhmatullin M., Sadykova D., Olennikova O., Fedorov A., Miklin Y., Bernyaev M., Kovalevskiy A.. Local-SandEnabled Channel Fracturing. Case Study from Jurassic Formations in Uvat Region. SPE196972-RU. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.2118/196972-MS
Review
For citations:
Churakov A.V., Pichugin M.N., Gaynetdinov R.R., Staritsin D.A., Shel E.V., Shapovalenko N.A., Fayzullin I.G., Ivshin A.V., Chebykin N.V., Samoylov I.S. Fractional sands — New instrument for hydraulic fracturing optimization. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2025;10(4):86-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2025-10-4-86-98
JATS XML


















