Mineral analysis of the heavy fraction via raman spectroscopy: insights from neogene deposits of the northeastern Sakhalin shelf
https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2026-11-2-6-17
Abstract
Introduction. In petroleum geology, heavy mineral analysis is an important tool for reconstructing sediment provenance, transport conditions, and diagenetic history of terrigenous rocks. However, the classical optical method has certain limitations that can be overcome by Raman spectroscopy, as this technique enables reliable identification of both transparent and opaque as well as well-rounded grains, and allows the detection of polymorphic modifications and micron-sized minerals. This significantly enhances the informational value of heavy mineral studies compared to conventional optical microscopy. The method was applied to wells drilled on the northeastern Sakhalin shelf—a key petroleum-bearing region with Neogene terrigenous reservoirs that have been only poorly investigated in terms of their heavy mineral composition.
Aim. To study the composition of heavy mineral assemblages in sandstones of the Neogene petroleumbearing succession (Nutov Horizon) on the northeastern Sakhalin shelf using Raman spectroscopy on core and cuttings samples from wells located at varying distances from the coast, in order to assess source area position, mineralogical maturity, and spatial variations in composition.
Materials and methods. A Raman spectroscopy study was carried out on core and drill cuttings material from the Nutov Horizon (Miocene–Pliocene) across five wells representing various fields on the northeastern shelf of Sakhalin Island.
Results. The results confi rm the assumption of a common provenance for the Lower and Upper Nutov deposits and indicate the proximal position of the source area. The identified heavy mineral associations can serve in the future as diagnostic markers for distinguishing between Lower and Upper Nutov subhorizons in well sections— particularly useful for young Neogene sediments that are difficult to stratify in the absence of index fossils, as well as for attributing core or cuttings samples that have lost their descriptive documentation.
Conclusion. Raman spectroscopy is an informative method for characterizing sediment provenance.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. KulikovaRussian Federation
Anna V. Kulikova — Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Senior researcher, Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies
18, Kremlevskaya str., Kazan, 420008
Novosibirsk
P. D. Kotler
Russian Federation
Pavel D. Kotler — Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Senior researcher
Kazan; Novosibirsk
R. N. Muzafаrov
Russian Federation
Rafael N. Muzaferov — Junior researcher, Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies
Kazan
E. A. Bulgakova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Bulgakova — Geological support program manager
Saint Peterburg
M. V. Snachev
Russian Federation
Michail V. Snachev — Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Product development manager
Saint Peterburg
R. N. Gainanshin
Russian Federation
Rustam N. Gainanshin — Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Product expertise manager
Saint Peterburg
S. F. Khafizov
Russian Federation
Sergey F. Khafizov — Dr. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Head of the Department of Oil and Gas Prospecting and Exploration
Moscow
References
1. Morton A.C., Hallsworth C.R. Identifying provenance-specific features of detrital heavy mineral assemblages in sandstones. Sedimentary Geology. 1994, vol. 90, pp. 241–256.
2. Morton A.C., Hallsworth C.R. Processes controlling the composition of heavy mineral assemblages in sandstones. Sedimentary Geology. 1999, vol. 124, pp. 3–29.
3. Mange M.A., Wright D.T. (Eds.) Heavy Minerals in Use. Developments in Sedimentology, 58. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007. 1283 p.
4. Nasdala L., Smith D.C., Kaindl R., Ziemann M.A. Raman spectroscopy: Analytical perspectives in mineralogical research. EMU Notes in Mineralogy. 2004, vol. 6, pp. 281–343.
5. Andò S., Garzanti E. Raman spectroscopy in heavy-mineral studies // Sediment Provenance Studies in Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production / Eds. R.A. Scott et al. Geological Society. London, Special Publications. 2014, vol. 386, pp. 395–412.
6. Geology of the USSR. Vol. XXXIII. Sakhalin Island. Moscow: Nedra, 1970. 207 p. (In Russ.).
7. Gladenkov Yu.B., Bazhenova O.K., Grechin V.I. et al. Cenozoic of Sakhalin and Its Petroleum Potential. Moscow: GEOS, 2002. 225 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kharakhinov V.V. Oil and Gas Geology of the Sakhalin Region. Moscow: Nauchnyy Mir, 2010. 276 p. (In Russ.)
9. Shein V.S., Ignatova V.A. Geodynamics and Petroleum Potential of Sedimentary Basins of the Russian Far East. Moscow: Nauchnyy Mir, 2007. 276 p. (In Russ.)
10. Maruyama S., Isozaki Y., Kimura G., Terabayashi M. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: plate tectonic synthesis from 750 Ma to present. Island Arc. 1997, vol. 6, pp. 121–142.
11. Sengör A.M.C., Natal’in B.A. Palaeotectonics of Asia: fragments of a synthesis. The Tectonic Evolution of Asia. Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996. P. 486–640.
12. Zyabrev S. Stratigraphy and structure of the central East Sakhalin accretionary wedge (Eastern Russia). Russian Journal of Pacific Geology. 2011, vol. 5, pp. 313–335.
13. Khanchuk A.I. Pre-Neogene tectonics of the Sea-of-Japan region: a view from the Russian side. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku). 2001, vol. 55, pp. 275–291.
14. Khanchuk A.I., Kemkin I.V., Kruk N.N. The Sikhote-Alin orogenic belt, Russian South East: Terranes and the formation of continental lithosphere based on geological and isotopic data. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2016, vol. 120, pp. 117–138.
15. Zhao P., Li J., Alexandrov I., Ivin V., Jahn B. Involvement of old crustal materials during formation of the Sakhalin Island (Russian Far East) and its paleogeographic implication: constraints from detrital zircon ages of modern river sand and Miocene sandstone. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2017, vol. 146, pp. 412–430.
16. Abrajevitch A., Zyabrev S., Didenko A.N., Kodama K. Palaeomagnetism of the West Sakhalin Basin: evidence for northward displacement during the Cretaceous. Geophysical Journal International. 2012, vol. 190, pp. 1439–1454.
17. Golozubov V.V., Kasatkin S.A., Grannik V.M., Nechayuk A.E. Deformation of the Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic complexes of the West Sakhalin terrane. Geotectonics. 2012, vol. 46, pp. 333–351.
18. Zharov A.E. South Sakhalin tectonics and geodynamics: A model for the Cretaceous–Paleogene accretion of the East Asian continental margin. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2005, vol. 7. ES5002.
19. Alexandrov I.A., Ivin V.V., Malinovsky A.I., Budnitskiy S.Yu. First Detrital Zircon Geochronology Data for Clastic Rocks of the East Sakhalin Accretionary Terrane. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2022, vol. 13, no. 2s, p. 0612. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-2s-0612
20. Gainanshin R.N. Shelf, Sakhalin Island — new horizons / R.N. Gainanshin, E.A. Zhukovskaya, M.V. Snachev [et al.]. Oil industry. 2018, no. 12, pp. 22–24. (In Russ.)
21. Shegay V.I., Tolstikov A.V. Features of the Structural and Tectonic Evolution of the Northeastern Shelf of Sakhalin Island Based on New Seismic Data. Oil and Gas Geology. 2022, no. 4, pp. 39–51. (In Russ.)
22. Zharov A.E. South Sakhalin tectonics and geodynamics: A model for the Cretaceous–Paleogene accretion of the East Asian continental margin. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2005, vol. 7. ES5002.
23. Mozley P.S., Carothers W.W. Elemental and isotopic composition of siderite in the Kuparuk Formation, Alaska: effect of microbial activity and water/sediment interaction on early pore-water chemistry. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 1992, vol. 62, pp. 681–692.
Review
For citations:
Kulikova A.V., Kotler P.D., Muzafаrov R.N., Bulgakova E.A., Snachev M.V., Gainanshin R.N., Khafizov S.F. Mineral analysis of the heavy fraction via raman spectroscopy: insights from neogene deposits of the northeastern Sakhalin shelf. PROneft. Professionally about Oil. 2026;11(2):6-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2026-11-2-6-17
JATS XML

















